Last week, as part of the “tech hour” on BBC Radio 5’s “Afternoon Edition” on Wednesdays, I heard one of their reporters do an item on visiting a facility in Australia which is trying to track space debris and locate their positions precisely. After the item a listener asked about geostationary orbits, and it was clear from the reporter’s answer that he did not really understand them. Then again, if he is not a trained physicist or engineer, why should he?

In the light of the wrong answer given to the listener by the reporter, I’ve decided to blog about satellite orbits to clear up any confusion, and also to show that the mathematics of it is not that hard. This is the kind of problem that a student studying physics would be expected to do in their last year of high-school here in Wales. Mark Thompson, one of the astronomers who has appeared on BBC Stargazing Live, did clear up some of the confusion when he came on the programme later in the same hour, but he did not have time to go into all the details (nor would he want to do so on a radio show!).

## Low-Earth and geostationary orbits

For those of you not familiar with the terminology, a low-Earth orbit is typically just a few hundred kilometres above the Earth’s surface, which as I will show below leads to an orbit about the Earth which takes a couple of hours at most. These are the kinds of orbits which are used by most spy satellites, and also by the International Space Station (ISS) and, when it used to fly, by the Space Shuttle. The famous Hubble Space Telescope is in a low-Earth orbit. Any satellites in low-Earth orbits will experience drag from the Earth’s atmosphere.

Space “officially” begins at 100km above the Earth’s surface, but the atmosphere doesn’t suddenly stop at any particular altitude,it just gets thinner and thiner. In fact, the “scale height” of the atmosphere is about 1 mile, or about 1.5km. For each 1.5km altitude, the amount of atmosphere roughly halves (based on pressure), so at an altitude of 3km the air is as thick, and if you go up to 10.5km which is roughly the altitude at which commercial aeroplanes fly, then the thickness of the atmosphere is about as thick, or of the thickness at the ground. Even though the thickness of the atmosphere a few hundred kilometres up is very very thin, there is still enough of it to slow satellites down. So, satellites in low-Earth orbits cannot maintain their orbits without some level of thrust, otherwise their orbits would just decay and they would burn up in the atmosphere.

Low-Earth orbit satellites can be in any orbit as long as it is centred on the Earth’s centre. So, for example, many spy satellites orbit the Earth’s poles. If you think about it, if they are taking about 90 minutes to orbit (some take less, they will be even closer to the Earth), then each time they orbit they will see a different part of the Earth, which is often what you want for spy satellites. The ISS orbits the Earth in an orbit which is titled to the Earth’s equator, so it passes over different parts of the Earth on each orbit, but it is not a polar orbit. A satellite cannot, for example, orbit, say, along an orbit which is directly above the tropic of Cancer, and satellites *do not* orbit the Earth in the opposite direction to the Earth’s rotation, they all orbit the Earth in the same direction as we are rotating.

*Geostationary orbits*, on the other hand, are a particular orbit where the satellite takes 24 hours to orbit the Earth. So, as seen by a person on the rotating Earth, they appear fixed relative to that person’s horizons. Geostationary orbits are used for communication satellites so that, for example, your TV satellite dish can be fixed to the side of your house and point in the same direction, as the satellite from which it’s getting the TV signals stays fixed in your sky. They are also used by Earth-monitoring satellites such as weather satellites and satellites which measure sea and land temperatures. A geostationary satellite has to be at a particular altitude above the Earth’s surface, and it has to be in orbit about the Earth’s equator (so it sits above the Earth’s equator), and of course orbits in the same direction as the Earth’s rotation.

How do we calculate the altitude of these respective orbits, the low-Earth and the geostationary ones? It is not too difficult, as I will show below.

## The altitude of a satellite which takes 90 minutes to orbit the Earth

To make the mathematics simpler, I will do these calculations assuming a circular orbit. In reality, some satellites have elliptical orbits where they are closer to the Earth’s surface at some times than at others, but that makes the maths a little more complicated, and it’s not necessary to understand the basic ideas.

As I showed in this blog, when an object is moving in a circle it must have a force acting on it, because its velocity (in this case its direction) is constantly changing. This force is called the *centripetal force*, and as I showed in the blog this is given by

where is the mass of the object moving in the circle, is its speed, and is the radius of the circle.

For a satellite orbiting the Earth, the centripetal force is provided by gravity, and the force of gravity is given by

where is the mass of the Earth (in this case), is the mass of the satellite, is the radius of the orbit *as measured from the centre of the Earth*, and is a physical constant, known as *Big G* or *the universal gravitational constant*.

Because the centripetal force is being provided by gravity, we can set these two equal to each other and so we have

The speed of orbit, is related to how long the satellite takes to orbit via the definition of speed. Speed is defined as distance travelled per unit time, and as we are assuming circular orbits the distance travelled in an orbit is the circumference of a circle. So, we can write

where is the time it takes to make the orbit. Substituting this expression for in Equation (1) we can write

Remember we are trying to calculate for a satellite which takes 90 minutes to orbit, so we re-arrange this equation to give

Notice that the only two variables in this equation are , everything else is a constant (for orbiting the Earth, obviously if the object were orbiting e.g. the Sun we’d replace the mass by the mass of the Sun). Equation (2) is, in fact, just Kepler’s Third law (which I blogged about here), which is that

Now, to calculate for a satellite taking 90 minutes to orbit, we just need to plug in the values for the mass of the Earth ( kg), the value of , and convert 90 minutes to seconds which is . Doing this, we get

But, remember, this is the radius from the Earth’s centre, so we need to subtract off the Earth’s radius to get the height above the Earth’s surface. The average radius of the Earth is so the height above the Earth’s surface of a satellite which takes 90 minutes to orbit is

which is roughly 300km.

## The altitude of a geostationary satellite

To calculate the altitude of a geostationary satellite we just need to replace the time in equation (2) with 24 hours (but put into seconds), instead of using 90 minutes. 24 hours is , and so we now have

Again, subtracting off the Earth’s radius, we get the altitude (height above the Earth’s surface) to be

which is roughly 36,000 km.

## Summary

It surprises most people that geostationary satellites are so far above the Earth’s surface, some 36,000 km. There is no atmosphere at that altitude, so geostationary satellites really pose no threat in terms of man-made space debris. Their orbits will not decay, as there is no atmospheric drag. It is the low-Earth orbit satellites which are the source of our man-made space debris, and if their orbits are not maintained the orbits will decay and they will burn up in the Earth’s atmosphere. Of course, most satellites entering the thicker parts of the atmosphere burn up completely, but larger satellites have been known to have parts of them survive to hit the Earth’s surface. For example this is what happened to the Russian space station MIR when its orbit was decayed by switching off its thrusters.

The time it takes a satellite to orbit the Earth is entirely dependent on how far from the centre of the Earth the satellite is. Low-Earth orbit satellites orbit the Earth in a matter of hours, many less than two hours. Geostationary satellites have to be about 36,000 km from the surface of the Earth in order to take 24 hours to orbit. *All* satellites orbit the Earth in the same direction as the Earth is rotating, except for satellites in a polar orbit which essentially allow the Earth to rotate below them as they go around the poles. Geostationary satellites have to orbit above the Earth’s equator, but other satellites can be in an orbit which is inclined to the equator, as long as the centre of their orbit is the centre of the Earth.

Finally, coming back to the issue of space debris; one of the reasons that space debris is so dangerous to other satellites and astronauts is that objects in Earth-orbit are moving very quickly. For example, for an object taking 90 minutes to orbit the Earth, such as the orbit the ISS is in, we can work out how quickly (in metres per second) it is moving quite easily.

If and the radius of the orbit (as we showed above) is then

so, nearly 7,740 m/s or 7.7 km/s or nearly 28 *thousand* km/h, which by anyone’s standards is FAST!

The damage a piece of space debris can make is dependent on its kinetic energy (KE), which is given by

An object with a mass of 1kg moving at 7,740 m/s will thus have a KE of

(or 30 Mega Joules). This is a huge amount of energy, because the object is moving so fast. By comparison, a car, which we will assume to have a mass of 1,000 kg, moving at 100 km/h will have a kinetic energy of , or nearly 0.8 Mega Joules, so about a factor of 40 (forty!) less than a 1kg object in low-Earth orbit. This is why such small objects can cause such damage!

on 19/11/2014 at 11:04 |Andrew BlainNot quite all satellites orbit in a prograde direction. All Sun-synchronous orbits are a little bit retrograde, as every day they don’t need to complete a full orbit, getting 0.3% of their lap around the Earth for free from the Earth’s motion around the Sun. Home-launched Israeli satellites are retrograde too, due to difficult relationships with countries that would be overflown on ascent, and I believe some radar reconnaissance satellites orbit to the west to maximize the relative speed of the satellite and the reflecting things.

on 19/11/2014 at 11:15 |RhEvansIndeed, I should have said “most”. Because of the difference between a sidereal day and a synodic day (I will explain the difference in a future blog), a satellite in a geostationary orbit actually moves

very slightlyretrograde compared to the fixed stars, so that its orbit corresponds to a synodic (solar) day.on 19/11/2014 at 12:32 |RhEvansMy comment stressing that all satellites orbit in the same direction as the Earth’s rotation was prompted by an erroneous statement on the radio show that “satellites are moving in all directions” in reference to space debris and collisions between space debris and satellites. But, as I admit above, I should have said “most” not “all” đŸ˜‰

on 28/01/2016 at 07:30 |Is Tim Peake getting younger or older? | thecuriousastronomer[…] is metres. The centripetal force keeping him in orbit is provided by the force of gravity, and in this blog I showed that the centripetal force is given […]

on 08/11/2016 at 07:45 |Do GPS satellites move in the sky? | thecuriousastronomer[…] I blogged about here, communication satellites need to be at a particular height above the Earth’s surface so that […]