Yesterday (Monday 27 June) I wrote a blogpost entitled “What is the scale height of water vapour in the Earth’s atmosphere?“. In that blogpost I said that the *scale height* of the gas (nitrogen, oxygen) in the Earth’s atmosphere was 7.64km, and that this means that every 7.64km it reduces by a factor of , which is a factor of .

This means that, at 7.64km, the atmosphere has a thickness (pressure) of of its value at sea level. If we go to twice this height, 15.28km, the pressure of the atmosphere is of its value at sea level. At it is of its value at sea level, etc.

The question was asked, why is it a factor of that we quote for the scale height, and not , or ? The answer is the way that the formula for the scale height is derived. It comes about from integrating an infinitesimal change in pressure divided by the pressure , that is the integral of , and this is what leads to the exponential.

## Deriving the equation for the scale height of the atmosphere

We are going to determine the pressure of the atmosphere as a function of altitude. Pressure is defined as the force per unit area, and for the atmosphere the pressure is due to the weight (*not mass*) of the overlying atmosphere. This is why pressure goes down with altitude. Let us assume that at a particular height the atmosphere has a density (mass per unit volume) of and a pressure .

If we have a small slab of volume , the mass of this slab will be . The weight of any object is given by , so the weight of this slab is . But, pressure is force (weight) per unit area, so

Re-arranging Equation (1) we get

where is the acceleration due to gravity at that particular altitude. In theory is a function of , but because the change in is so small for the changes in that we will consider, we are going to assume it is constant. The minus sign in the above expression is because decreases as we increase .

For an ideal gas, we can write

where is the number of molecules, is Boltzmann’s constant, and is the temperature in Kelvin. If the mass of each molecules is , then the total mass of the slab of gas is , and so we can say that the density is

If we combine equations (2) and (3) we get

Re-arranging Equation (4) we get

Equation (5) is a differential equation, so to solve it we integrate

which becomes

where is a constant which we determine by the boundary conditions. is the natural logarithm of the pressure , that is the logarithm to the base . The boundary conditions are that at , the pressure at sea level, so we can write

Putting this back in Equation (6) we have

We get rid of the logarithm in Equation (7) by taking the exponent, so it becomes

Finally, we define the scale height as so we have

As we can see, the pressure varies with altitude in the sense that the ratio of pressure at any altitude to its value at sea level is given by an exponent; the negative sign in the exponent tells us that pressure will decrease with increasing altitude.

## The variation of pressure with altitude

If we plot Equation (9) we get the following (with a value of )

This shows the exponential drop off of atmospheric pressure with altitude, as given in Equation (9) above. We can, however, plot the pressure (y-axis) on a logarithmic scale. We take Equation (9) and write

which we can re-arrange to give

This is the equation of a straight line (c.f. ), so the intercept of our straight line is and our gradient is . It is because the integration of our expression (Equation (5) above) produces an exponential that the scale height is expressed as the altitude one needs to ascend for the pressure to drop by a factor of and not, e.g. 1/2.

on 05/07/2016 at 07:31 |Euler’s Number (the mathematical constant ‘e’) | thecuriousastronomer[…] week, in this blogpost here, I tried to explain why the scale height of the atmosphere is defined as the altitude one has to […]

on 25/05/2018 at 12:32 |tallblokeExcellent, thank you

on 26/05/2018 at 07:46 |tallblokeIs this why we also see e show up in the barometric formula for the isothermal atmosphere?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Kinetic/kintem.html#c1

on 26/05/2018 at 08:52 |RhEvansYes it is

on 26/05/2018 at 16:51 |tallblokeIn effect then, the exponential term makes the pressure curve intelligible relative to the lapse rate? Is that a useful summary?

on 26/05/2018 at 17:16 |RhEvansAtmospheric pressure drops with height (altitude) following an exponential decline. It just comes from basic physics.

on 26/05/2018 at 19:02 |tallblokeSure, I get that. I was just exploring the reason for the fairly linear lapse rate relative to the exponential drop in pressure.